Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RSEFX vs SSGSX
RSEFX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts RSEFX vs SSGSX
Royce Small-Cap Special Equity Svc
Price$15.62
Change+$0.04 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets509.17M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$47.38
Change+$0.08 (+0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.64B
RSEFX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RSEFX vs. SSGSX commentary
Sep 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RSEFX is a Buy and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.64B vs. RSEFX (509M). RSEFX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: RSEFX (2.09) vs SSGSX (0.47). RSEFX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: RSEFX (22 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). RSEFX (1.58) is less costly to investors than SSGSX (1.26). SSGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. RSEFX (5.00). RSEFX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: RSEFX (2000) vs SSGSX (2500). SSGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.56 vs. RSEFX (-4.77). SSGSX return over 5 years is better than : 22.95 vs. RSEFX (-1.22).
| RSEFX | SSGSX | RSEFX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 1.26 | 118% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.58 | 1.26 | 125% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.763 | 2.046 | 135% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2500 | 80% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 509M | 5.64B | 9% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.09 | 0.47 | 441% |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.77 | -1.56 | 306% |
| Returns for 3 years | -3.46 | 3.97 | -87% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.22 | 22.95 | -5% |
| Returns for 10 years | -19.13 | 24.71 | -77% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement