Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RSIPX vs RWMFX
RSIPX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts RSIPX vs RWMFX
RSIPX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RSIPX vs. RWMFX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RSIPX is a Buy and RWMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. RSIPX (5.07B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than RSIPX: RWMFX (1.40) vs RSIPX (0.69). RSIPX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: RSIPX (20 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). RSIPX (0.68) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). RSIPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. RWMFX (29.00). RSIPX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWMFX: RSIPX (0) vs RWMFX (250). RSIPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.96 vs. RWMFX (7.03). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 26.38 vs. RSIPX (12.27).
| RSIPX | RWMFX | RSIPX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.31 | 219% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.31 | 219% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.073 | 1.322 | 459% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.07B | 218B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.69 | 1.40 | 49% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.96 | 7.03 | 156% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.63 | 30.20 | 108% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.27 | 26.38 | 47% |
| Returns for 10 years | 83.49 | 82.33 | 101% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement