Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RSLAX vs WAGOX
RSLAX vs WAGOX Comparison
Open Charts RSLAX vs WAGOX
RSLAX vs WAGOX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RSLAX vs. WAGOX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RSLAX is a Buy and WAGOX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLAX has more cash in the bank: 91.4B vs. WAGOX (139M). RSLAX pays higher dividends than WAGOX: RSLAX (0.17) vs WAGOX (0.00). RSLAX was incepted earlier than WAGOX: RSLAX (24 years) vs WAGOX (18 years). RSLAX (1.74) is less costly to investors than WAGOX (1.48). RSLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. WAGOX (37.00). RSLAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WAGOX: RSLAX (250) vs WAGOX (2000). RSLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.36 vs. WAGOX (-8.10). RSLAX return over 5 years is better than : -14.43 vs. WAGOX (-33.57).
| RSLAX | WAGOX | RSLAX / WAGOX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.74 | 1.48 | 118% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.74 | 1.48 | 118% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.723 | 5.867 | 200% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 91.4B | 139M | 65,755% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.17 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.36 | -8.10 | -91% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.50 | 2.58 | 1,296% |
| Returns for 5 years | -14.43 | -33.57 | 43% |
| Returns for 10 years | 63.67 | 16.58 | 384% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement