Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RSLCX vs SCWFX
RSLCX vs SCWFX Comparison
Open Charts RSLCX vs SCWFX
RSLCX vs SCWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RSLCX vs. SCWFX commentary
Sep 19, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RSLCX is a Hold and SCWFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLCX (91.4B) and SCWFX (91.4B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . SCWFX pays higher dividends than RSLCX: SCWFX (0.56) vs RSLCX (0.43). RSLCX was incepted earlier than SCWFX: RSLCX (24 years) vs SCWFX (26 years). RSLCX (1.30) is less costly to investors than SCWFX (1.07). RSLCX (41.00) and SCWFX (41.00) have comparable annual turnover. RSLCX (250) and SCWFX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. SCWFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.99 vs. RSLCX (6.48). SCWFX return over 5 years is better than : -10.70 vs. RSLCX (-12.33).
| RSLCX | SCWFX | RSLCX / SCWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 1.07 | 121% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 1.07 | 121% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.855 | 11.036 | 98% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 91.4B | 91.4B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.43 | 0.56 | 77% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.48 | 6.99 | 93% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.09 | 37.34 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | -12.33 | -10.70 | 115% |
| Returns for 10 years | 71.09 | 77.15 | 92% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers