Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RSLEX vs SCWFX
RSLEX vs SCWFX Comparison
Open Charts RSLEX vs SCWFX
RSLEX vs SCWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RSLEX vs. SCWFX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RSLEX is a Hold and SCWFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLEX (94.3B) and SCWFX (94.3B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . RSLEX pays higher dividends than SCWFX: RSLEX (0.63) vs SCWFX (0.58). RSLEX was incepted earlier than SCWFX: RSLEX (24 years) vs SCWFX (25 years). SCWFX (1.07) is less costly to investors than RSLEX (1.00). RSLEX (41.00) and SCWFX (41.00) have comparable annual turnover. RSLEX (250) and SCWFX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RSLEX (12.76) and SCWFX (12.66) have marching annual gain over last year. RSLEX return over 5 years is better than : -6.77 vs. SCWFX (-7.17).
| RSLEX | SCWFX | RSLEX / SCWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 1.07 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 1.07 | 93% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.357 | 10.314 | 100% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 94.3B | 94.3B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.63 | 0.58 | 109% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.76 | 12.66 | 101% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.59 | 27.26 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | -6.77 | -7.17 | 94% |
| Returns for 10 years | 81.07 | 79.75 | 102% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers