Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RSLEX vs SMCWX
RSLEX vs SMCWX Comparison
Open Charts RSLEX vs SMCWX
RSLEX vs SMCWX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RSLEX vs. SMCWX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RSLEX is a Hold and SMCWX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLEX (88.9B) and SMCWX (88.9B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . RSLEX (0.65) and SMCWX (0.63) have matching dividends . RSLEX was incepted earlier than SMCWX: RSLEX (24 years) vs SMCWX (36 years). SMCWX (1.03) and RSLEX (1.00) have similar cost to investors . RSLEX (41.00) and SMCWX (41.00) have comparable annual turnover. RSLEX (250) and SMCWX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. SMCWX (20.58) and RSLEX (20.47) have marching annual gain over last year. RSLEX return over 5 years is better than : -2.89 vs. SMCWX (-3.08).
| RSLEX | SMCWX | RSLEX / SMCWX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 1.03 | 97% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 1.03 | 97% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 36 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.078 | 12.785 | 94% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 88.9B | 88.9B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.65 | 0.63 | 103% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.47 | 20.58 | 99% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.40 | 38.22 | 98% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.89 | -3.08 | 94% |
| Returns for 10 years | 88.57 | 89.89 | 99% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement