Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RSLFX vs SGSCX
RSLFX vs SGSCX Comparison
Open Charts RSLFX vs SGSCX
RSLFX vs SGSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RSLFX vs. SGSCX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RSLFX is a StrongBuy and SGSCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLFX has more cash in the bank: 94.3B vs. SGSCX (205M). RSLFX pays higher dividends than SGSCX: RSLFX (0.79) vs SGSCX (0.73). RSLFX was incepted earlier than SGSCX: RSLFX (24 years) vs SGSCX (35 years). SGSCX (1.17) is less costly to investors than RSLFX (0.70). SGSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. RSLFX (41.00). RSLFX has a lower initial minimum investment than SGSCX: RSLFX (250) vs SGSCX (2500). SGSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.67 vs. RSLFX (14.40). SGSCX return over 5 years is better than : 1.87 vs. RSLFX (-2.14).
| RSLFX | SGSCX | RSLFX / SGSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.11 | 63% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.17 | 60% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 35 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.200 | 20.365 | 60% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 94.3B | 205M | 46,000% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.79 | 0.73 | 108% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.40 | 23.67 | 61% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.56 | 36.79 | 86% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.14 | 1.87 | -114% |
| Returns for 10 years | 94.91 | 10.57 | 898% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers