Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RSLFX vs SGSCX
RSLFX vs SGSCX Comparison
Open Charts RSLFX vs SGSCX
RSLFX vs SGSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RSLFX vs. SGSCX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RSLFX is a Buy and SGSCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLFX has more cash in the bank: 91.4B vs. SGSCX (200M). RSLFX pays higher dividends than SGSCX: RSLFX (0.81) vs SGSCX (0.75). RSLFX was incepted earlier than SGSCX: RSLFX (24 years) vs SGSCX (35 years). SGSCX (1.17) is less costly to investors than RSLFX (0.70). SGSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. RSLFX (41.00). RSLFX has a lower initial minimum investment than SGSCX: RSLFX (250) vs SGSCX (2500). SGSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.79 vs. RSLFX (9.55). SGSCX return over 5 years is better than : -1.79 vs. RSLFX (-7.47).
| RSLFX | SGSCX | RSLFX / SGSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.11 | 63% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.17 | 60% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 35 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.524 | 18.328 | 68% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 91.4B | 200M | 45,700% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.81 | 0.75 | 109% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.55 | 13.79 | 69% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.09 | 37.18 | 105% |
| Returns for 5 years | -7.47 | -1.79 | 417% |
| Returns for 10 years | 90.43 | 6.66 | 1,357% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement