Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RSLFX vs TESGX
RSLFX vs TESGX Comparison
Open Charts RSLFX vs TESGX
RSLFX vs TESGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RSLFX vs. TESGX commentary
Jul 09, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RSLFX is a Buy and TESGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLFX has more cash in the bank: 91.5B vs. TESGX (831M). RSLFX pays higher dividends than TESGX: RSLFX (0.79) vs TESGX (0.57). RSLFX was incepted earlier than TESGX: RSLFX (24 years) vs TESGX (31 years). TESGX (2.08) is less costly to investors than RSLFX (0.70). RSLFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. TESGX (15.75). RSLFX has a lower initial minimum investment than TESGX: RSLFX (250) vs TESGX (1000). RSLFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.97 vs. TESGX (12.03). RSLFX return over 5 years is better than : 1.47 vs. TESGX (-11.35).
| RSLFX | TESGX | RSLFX / TESGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 2.08 | 34% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 2.08 | 34% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.203 | 12.969 | 125% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 91.5B | 831M | 11,011% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.79 | 0.57 | 138% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.97 | 12.03 | 158% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.85 | 23.61 | 177% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.47 | -11.35 | -13% |
| Returns for 10 years | 105.37 | 30.55 | 345% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement