Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RSLFX vs TVFVX
RSLFX vs TVFVX Comparison
Open Charts RSLFX vs TVFVX
RSLFX vs TVFVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RSLFX vs. TVFVX commentary
Sep 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RSLFX is a Hold and TVFVX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLFX has more cash in the bank: 89B vs. TVFVX (1.07B). TVFVX pays higher dividends than RSLFX: TVFVX (1.68) vs RSLFX (0.81). RSLFX was incepted earlier than TVFVX: RSLFX (24 years) vs TVFVX (17 years). TVFVX (1.39) is less costly to investors than RSLFX (0.70). RSLFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. TVFVX (23.00). RSLFX has a lower initial minimum investment than TVFVX: RSLFX (250) vs TVFVX (2500). TVFVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 31.28 vs. RSLFX (13.53). TVFVX return over 5 years is better than : 86.59 vs. RSLFX (-7.98).
| RSLFX | TVFVX | RSLFX / TVFVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.39 | 50% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.39 | 50% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.483 | 23.225 | 58% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 89B | 1.07B | 8,349% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.81 | 1.68 | 48% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.53 | 31.28 | 43% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.47 | 52.26 | 70% |
| Returns for 5 years | -7.98 | 86.59 | -9% |
| Returns for 10 years | 88.68 | 101.95 | 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers