Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RSQAX vs RWMHX
RSQAX vs RWMHX Comparison
Open Charts RSQAX vs RWMHX
RSQAX vs RWMHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RSQAX vs. RWMHX commentary
Jul 31, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RSQAX is a Buy and RWMHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMHX has more cash in the bank: 219B vs. RSQAX (155M). RSQAX pays higher dividends than RWMHX: RSQAX (1.59) vs RWMHX (1.35). RSQAX was incepted earlier than RWMHX: RSQAX (18 years) vs RWMHX (11 years). RSQAX (1.19) is less costly to investors than RWMHX (0.41). RWMHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. RSQAX (25.00). RSQAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWMHX: RSQAX (0) vs RWMHX (250). RSQAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.80 vs. RWMHX (6.14). RWMHX return over 5 years is better than : 28.26 vs. RSQAX (-11.94).
| RSQAX | RWMHX | RSQAX / RWMHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.12 | 0.41 | 273% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 0.41 | 290% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.210 | 4.993 | 345% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 155M | 219B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.59 | 1.35 | 117% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.80 | 6.14 | 176% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.45 | 27.60 | 31% |
| Returns for 5 years | -11.94 | 28.26 | -42% |
| Returns for 10 years | -9.64 | 78.90 | -12% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers