Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RSQAX vs RWMHX
RSQAX vs RWMHX Comparison
Open Charts RSQAX vs RWMHX
RSQAX vs RWMHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RSQAX vs. RWMHX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RSQAX is a Buy and RWMHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMHX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. RSQAX (154M). RSQAX pays higher dividends than RWMHX: RSQAX (1.49) vs RWMHX (1.33). RSQAX was incepted earlier than RWMHX: RSQAX (18 years) vs RWMHX (11 years). RSQAX (1.19) is less costly to investors than RWMHX (0.41). RWMHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. RSQAX (25.00). RSQAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWMHX: RSQAX (0) vs RWMHX (250). RSQAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.66 vs. RWMHX (1.96). RWMHX return over 5 years is better than : 26.83 vs. RSQAX (-11.31).
| RSQAX | RWMHX | RSQAX / RWMHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.12 | 0.41 | 273% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 0.41 | 290% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.124 | 4.436 | 409% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 154M | 218B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.49 | 1.33 | 113% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.66 | 1.96 | 391% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.16 | 29.79 | 44% |
| Returns for 5 years | -11.31 | 26.83 | -42% |
| Returns for 10 years | -7.99 | 81.23 | -10% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers