Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RTDRX vs RWEBX
RTDRX vs RWEBX Comparison
Open Charts RTDRX vs RWEBX
RTDRX vs RWEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RTDRX vs. RWEBX commentary
Jul 01, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RTDRX is a Hold and RWEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. RTDRX (284M). RTDRX pays higher dividends than RWEBX: RTDRX (1.02) vs RWEBX (0.75). RTDRX was incepted earlier than RWEBX: RTDRX (10 years) vs RWEBX (12 years). RWEBX (1.06) is less costly to investors than RTDRX (0.49). RWEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. RTDRX (25.00). RTDRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWEBX: RTDRX (0) vs RWEBX (250). RWEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.51 vs. RTDRX (-9.62). RWEBX return over 5 years is better than : 23.87 vs. RTDRX (-11.33).
| RTDRX | RWEBX | RTDRX / RWEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.47 | 1.06 | 44% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.49 | 1.06 | 46% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.667 | 2.972 | 325% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 284M | 218B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.02 | 0.75 | 136% |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.62 | 5.51 | -175% |
| Returns for 3 years | -5.85 | 26.85 | -22% |
| Returns for 5 years | -11.33 | 23.87 | -47% |
| Returns for 10 years | 43.83 | 73.85 | 59% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement