Ad is loading...
RUDAX vs SSGSX
RUDAX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts RUDAX vs SSGSX
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$40.06
Change+$0.33 (+0.83%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.29B
RUDAX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RUDAX vs. SSGSX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RUDAX is a Buy and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.29B vs. RUDAX (57.2M). RUDAX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: RUDAX (1.44) vs SSGSX (0.52). RUDAX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: RUDAX (9 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). RUDAX (1.45) is less costly to investors than SSGSX (1.26). RUDAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.75 vs. SSGSX (37.00). RUDAX (6%) and SSGSX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. RUDAX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: RUDAX (1000) vs SSGSX (2500). SSGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -15.28 vs. RUDAX (-17.12). SSGSX return over 5 years is better than : 22.94 vs. RUDAX (17.12).
| RUDAX | SSGSX | RUDAX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 1.26 | 103% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.45 | 1.26 | 115% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -12.728 | -14.430 | 88% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 57.2M | 5.29B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.44 | 0.52 | 279% |
| Returns for 1 year | -17.12 | -15.28 | 112% |
| Returns for 3 years | -29.15 | -16.96 | 172% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.12 | 22.94 | 75% |
| Returns for 10 years | -16.03 | 1.36 | -1,179% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...