Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RUDAX vs SSGSX
RUDAX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts RUDAX vs SSGSX
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$44.37
Change-$0.09 (-0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.96B
RUDAX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RUDAX vs. SSGSX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RUDAX is a Hold and SSGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 4.96B vs. RUDAX (50.4M). RUDAX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: RUDAX (1.28) vs SSGSX (0.49). RUDAX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: RUDAX (9 years) vs SSGSX (27 years). RUDAX (1.45) is less costly to investors than SSGSX (1.26). RUDAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.75 vs. SSGSX (37.00). RUDAX (6%) and SSGSX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. RUDAX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: RUDAX (1000) vs SSGSX (2500). RUDAX (-13.77) and SSGSX (-13.94) have marching annual gain over last year. SSGSX return over 5 years is better than : 2.50 vs. RUDAX (-0.01).
| RUDAX | SSGSX | RUDAX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 1.26 | 103% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.45 | 1.26 | 115% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.214 | -4.243 | -52% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 50.4M | 4.96B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.28 | 0.49 | 264% |
| Returns for 1 year | -13.77 | -13.94 | 99% |
| Returns for 3 years | -13.33 | -10.31 | 129% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.01 | 2.50 | -0% |
| Returns for 10 years | 6.10 | 12.84 | 47% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement