Ad is loading...
RUDAX vs SSGSX
RUDAX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts RUDAX vs SSGSX
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$43.60
Change+$0.57 (+1.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.8B
RUDAX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RUDAX vs. SSGSX commentary
Apr 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RUDAX is a Buy and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.8B vs. RUDAX (62M). RUDAX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: RUDAX (1.44) vs SSGSX (0.52). RUDAX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: RUDAX (9 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). RUDAX (1.45) is less costly to investors than SSGSX (1.26). RUDAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.75 vs. SSGSX (37.00). RUDAX (6%) and SSGSX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. RUDAX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: RUDAX (1000) vs SSGSX (2500). SSGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -10.13 vs. RUDAX (-12.57). SSGSX return over 5 years is better than : 49.15 vs. RUDAX (42.17).
| RUDAX | SSGSX | RUDAX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 1.26 | 103% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.45 | 1.26 | 115% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.977 | -7.323 | 82% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 62M | 5.8B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.44 | 0.52 | 279% |
| Returns for 1 year | -12.57 | -10.13 | 124% |
| Returns for 3 years | -26.54 | -12.11 | 219% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.17 | 49.15 | 86% |
| Returns for 10 years | -8.39 | 9.81 | -86% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...