Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RUDAX vs SSGSX
RUDAX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts RUDAX vs SSGSX
RUDAX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RUDAX vs. SSGSX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RUDAX is a Hold and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 4.55B vs. RUDAX (301M). RUDAX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: RUDAX (0.89) vs SSGSX (0.51). RUDAX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: RUDAX (10 years) vs SSGSX (27 years). RUDAX (1.56) is less costly to investors than SSGSX (1.23). RUDAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.55 vs. SSGSX (50.00). RUDAX (6%) and SSGSX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. RUDAX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: RUDAX (1000) vs SSGSX (2500). SSGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.30 vs. RUDAX (-8.11). SSGSX return over 5 years is better than : -0.56 vs. RUDAX (-28.81).
| RUDAX | SSGSX | RUDAX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.41 | 1.23 | 115% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.56 | 1.23 | 127% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 22.065 | 18.572 | 119% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 301M | 4.55B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.89 | 0.51 | 175% |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.11 | 17.30 | -47% |
| Returns for 3 years | -11.83 | 11.95 | -99% |
| Returns for 5 years | -28.81 | -0.56 | 5,181% |
| Returns for 10 years | -5.02 | 41.05 | -12% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement