Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RUDAX vs SSGSX
RUDAX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts RUDAX vs SSGSX
RUDAX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RUDAX vs. SSGSX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RUDAX is a Hold and SSGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 4.1B vs. RUDAX (285M). RUDAX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: RUDAX (0.92) vs SSGSX (0.52). RUDAX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: RUDAX (10 years) vs SSGSX (27 years). RUDAX (1.56) is less costly to investors than SSGSX (1.23). RUDAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.55 vs. SSGSX (50.00). RUDAX (6%) and SSGSX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. RUDAX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: RUDAX (1000) vs SSGSX (2500). SSGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.91 vs. RUDAX (-15.85). SSGSX return over 5 years is better than : -2.55 vs. RUDAX (-30.55).
| RUDAX | SSGSX | RUDAX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.41 | 1.23 | 115% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.56 | 1.23 | 127% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.902 | 15.641 | 108% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 285M | 4.1B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.92 | 0.52 | 177% |
| Returns for 1 year | -15.85 | 8.91 | -178% |
| Returns for 3 years | -12.92 | 12.96 | -100% |
| Returns for 5 years | -30.55 | -2.55 | 1,199% |
| Returns for 10 years | -25.03 | 35.89 | -70% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers