RUN vs TAN
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RUN is a StrongSell and TAN is a StrongSell.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
RUN’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- RUN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
RUN | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 16 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 89 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 92 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 91 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 99 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| RUN | TAN | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 88% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 85% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 89% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 84% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 84% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 90% |
RUN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RUN has been closely correlated with NOVA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RUN jumps, then NOVA could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RUN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RUN | 100% | -9.35% | ||
| NOVA - RUN | 82% Closely correlated | -6.95% | ||
| ENPH - RUN | 70% Closely correlated | -6.36% | ||
| FCEL - RUN | 67% Closely correlated | -12.13% | ||
| SEDG - RUN | 65% Loosely correlated | -17.07% | ||
| FSLR - RUN | 62% Loosely correlated | -2.40% | ||
More | ||||
TAN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TAN has been closely correlated with RUN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TAN jumps, then RUN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TAN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TAN | 100% | -3.54% | ||
| RUN - TAN | 86% Closely correlated | -9.35% | ||
| ENPH - TAN | 83% Closely correlated | -6.36% | ||
| SEDG - TAN | 78% Closely correlated | -17.07% | ||
| FSLR - TAN | 78% Closely correlated | -2.40% | ||
| CSIQ - TAN | 77% Closely correlated | -6.63% | ||
More | ||||