RUSHA vs RUSHB
To understand the difference between Rush Enterprises Inc - Ordinary Shares - Class A (RUSHA) vs. Rush Enterprises Inc - Ordinary Shares - Class B (RUSHB) it is enough to know the definitions of Ordinary Shares - Class A and Ordinary Shares - Class B
Ordinary Shares - Class A - Class A shares usually refer to common stocks with more voting rights than Class B shares. They often imply enhanced benefits such as dividend priority and liquidation preferences to the holder. Traditionally, this type of share helps a company's management to keep control over the company.
Ordinary Shares - Class B - Generally, Class B shares are issued by a company as a common stock with fewer voting rights and lower dividend priority than Class A shares. Class B may also have lower repayment priority in the event of a bankruptcy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
RUSHA’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileRUSHB’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
- RUSHA’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
- RUSHB’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
RUSHA’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RUSHB’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- RUSHA’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
- RUSHB’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
RUSHA (@Specialty Stores) experienced а +8.17% price change this week, while RUSHB (@Specialty Stores) price change was +5.72% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was +6.49%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.98%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.26%.
Reported Earning Dates
RUSHA is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2025.
RUSHB is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Specialty Stores (+6.49% weekly)The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.
| RUSHA | RUSHB | RUSHA / RUSHB | |
| Capitalization | 4.12B | 4.12B | 100% |
| EBITDA | 737M | 737M | 100% |
| Gain YTD | -4.864 | 3.948 | -123% |
| P/E Ratio | 12.75 | 12.65 | 101% |
| Revenue | 7.93B | 7.93B | 100% |
| Total Cash | 184M | 184M | 100% |
| Total Debt | 1.81B | 1.81B | 100% |
RUSHA | RUSHB | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 58 | 64 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 27 Undervalued | 27 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 13 | 8 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 55 | 55 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 61 | 54 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 23 | 16 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
RUSHA's Valuation (27) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is in the same range as RUSHB (27). This means that RUSHA’s stock grew similarly to RUSHB’s over the last 12 months.
RUSHB's Profit vs Risk Rating (8) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is in the same range as RUSHA (13). This means that RUSHB’s stock grew similarly to RUSHA’s over the last 12 months.
RUSHB's SMR Rating (55) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is in the same range as RUSHA (55). This means that RUSHB’s stock grew similarly to RUSHA’s over the last 12 months.
RUSHB's Price Growth Rating (54) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is in the same range as RUSHA (61). This means that RUSHB’s stock grew similarly to RUSHA’s over the last 12 months.
RUSHB's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is in the same range as RUSHA (23). This means that RUSHB’s stock grew similarly to RUSHA’s over the last 12 months.
| RUSHA | RUSHB | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 59% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 64% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 74% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 54% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 61% | 8 days ago 56% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 68% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| SZK | 12.24 | 0.27 | +2.22% |
| ProShares UltraShort Consumer Staples | |||
| EWA | 25.42 | 0.24 | +0.95% |
| iShares MSCI Australia ETF | |||
| JANZ | 34.38 | 0.30 | +0.89% |
| TrueShares Structured Outcome JanuaryETF | |||
| ECML | 31.18 | 0.23 | +0.73% |
| Euclidean Fundamental Value ETF | |||
| MUST | 20.02 | -0.07 | -0.35% |
| Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Inc ETF | |||
RUSHA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RUSHA has been closely correlated with RUSHB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RUSHA jumps, then RUSHB could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RUSHA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RUSHA | 100% | +2.03% | ||
| RUSHB - RUSHA | 88% Closely correlated | +1.94% | ||
| AN - RUSHA | 65% Loosely correlated | +1.12% | ||
| LAD - RUSHA | 65% Loosely correlated | +1.17% | ||
| ABG - RUSHA | 64% Loosely correlated | +1.64% | ||
| PAG - RUSHA | 63% Loosely correlated | +0.20% | ||
More | ||||
RUSHB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RUSHB has been closely correlated with RUSHA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RUSHB jumps, then RUSHA could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RUSHB | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RUSHB | 100% | +1.94% | ||
| RUSHA - RUSHB | 88% Closely correlated | +2.03% | ||
| AN - RUSHB | 62% Loosely correlated | +1.12% | ||
| LAD - RUSHB | 61% Loosely correlated | +1.17% | ||
| ABG - RUSHB | 61% Loosely correlated | +1.64% | ||
| GPI - RUSHB | 60% Loosely correlated | +1.20% | ||
More | ||||