Advertisement
RUSHA vs RUSHB
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Rush Enterprises Class A (RUSHA) vs. Rush Enterprises Class B (RUSHB) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- RUSHA and RUSHB are two share classes of the same company, Rush Enterprises, Inc., with identical economic rights but different voting power and liquidity profiles.
- Both classes rose on a strong third-quarter report showing 12.4% revenue growth and resilient aftermarket (parts and service) profitability.
- The core difference is structural: RUSHA offers far deeper liquidity and broader institutional ownership, while RUSHB carries enhanced voting rights but trades thinly.
- Tickeron AI Verdict: RUSHA is the favored ticker, reflecting superior liquidity, more stable price discovery, and a more consistent tradable trend.
- Get more context on each name through RUSHA Major News and RUSHA Today's Price Move, as well as RUSHB Major News and RUSHB Today's Price Move.
- Explore curated, market-ready strategies in the Trending AI Robots section to see which automated approaches are currently favored.
Introduction
Comparing RUSHA and RUSHB is, at first glance, unusual: both tickers represent Rush Enterprises, Inc., the largest network of commercial vehicle dealerships in North America operating under the Rush Truck Centers brand. The distinction lies in share class. Class A shares (RUSHA) carry one-twentieth of a vote each, while Class B shares (RUSHB) carry one full vote, concentrating control with the founding Rush family. Because the two classes share identical economics and dividends, this stock comparison matters most to traders and investors weighing liquidity, voting influence, and market positioning rather than differing underlying businesses.
RUSHA Overview and Recent Performance
RUSHA is the more widely held Class A line, reflecting the broadest institutional participation and the deepest trading volume of the two. In recent market activity, the shares have tracked the company's improving fundamentals. Rush Enterprises reported third-quarter revenue of roughly $2.11 billion, up 12.4% year over year, with diluted earnings per share (EPS) of $0.65. Aftermarket products and services—parts, service, and collision repair—contributed close to 63% of total gross profit, underscoring the stability of higher-margin recurring work even as new-truck sales fluctuate. Sentiment has also been shaped by a three-for-two stock split, a post-split dividend increase, and a completed joint venture with MCT Companies that expanded the company into refrigerated transportation.
RUSHB Overview and Recent Performance
RUSHB represents the Class B line and trades at a higher nominal price, though it commands a much smaller float and lower average daily volume. Its price action in recent weeks has mirrored the same fundamental story, but with amplified moves and wider bid-ask spreads given thinner liquidity. The Class B shares benefit from full voting power, a feature valued by investors focused on governance, but this structure also means outside shareholders have limited influence. Relative performance has been comparable on an economic basis, though RUSHB has at times displayed stronger short-term technical momentum, partly a function of its scarcity and lower institutional ownership.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page curates a focused selection from a much larger universe of AI trading bots that collectively monitor and trade thousands of tickers. Rather than surfacing every available bot, the page highlights those whose strategies, risk profiles, and recent performance align most closely with current market conditions. Bots vary widely in trading style, timeframe, win rate, and the set of tickers they follow, so the featured list reflects a dynamic, data-driven shortlist rather than a static catalog. For traders evaluating names like the Rush Enterprises share classes, reviewing these curated strategies can provide an additional lens on momentum, trend consistency, and timing. Explore the Trending AI Robots page to see which approaches are currently being favored.
Head-to-Head Comparison
The most consequential contrast between RUSHA and RUSHB is not the underlying business—which is identical—but rather liquidity and control. RUSHA offers substantially higher institutional ownership and daily volume, enabling tighter spreads and easier entry and exit. RUSHB provides full voting rights but trades thinly, making it more susceptible to wider spreads and sharper price swings. On growth drivers, both classes share the same catalysts: recovering freight rates, strong Class 8 heavy-truck deliveries, and an aftermarket business that smooths cyclical volatility. Shared risks include uncertainty around the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) 2027 emissions rules, which has prompted fleets to delay orders, plus supplier constraints and margin pressure. For market positioning, RUSHA is the more efficient vehicle for most investors, while RUSHB appeals chiefly to those prioritizing voting influence.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable factors, Tickeron's AI would currently favor RUSHA. The Class A line exhibits superior liquidity, broader institutional ownership, and more consistent price discovery, which supports a steadier and more reliably measurable trend. While RUSHB has shown notable technical momentum at times, its thinner float and wider spreads introduce greater execution risk and noisier signals. With both classes sharing the same catalysts—improving truck demand and a resilient aftermarket business—the AI's relative positioning tilts toward RUSHA as the more stable and tradable candidate, though this reflects a probabilistic assessment rather than a definitive forecast.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
To understand the difference between Rush Enterprises Inc - Ordinary Shares - Class A (RUSHA) vs. Rush Enterprises Inc - Ordinary Shares - Class B (RUSHB) it is enough to know the definitions of Ordinary Shares - Class A and Ordinary Shares - Class B
Ordinary Shares - Class A - Class A shares usually refer to common stocks with more voting rights than Class B shares. They often imply enhanced benefits such as dividend priority and liquidation preferences to the holder. Traditionally, this type of share helps a company's management to keep control over the company.
Ordinary Shares - Class B - Generally, Class B shares are issued by a company as a common stock with fewer voting rights and lower dividend priority than Class A shares. Class B may also have lower repayment priority in the event of a bankruptcy.
RUSHA's RSI Indicator climbs out of oversold territory
The RSI Indicator for RUSHA moved out of oversold territory on October 29, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is shifting from a downward trend to an upward trend. Traders may want to buy the stock or call options. The A.I.dvisor looked at 22 similar instances when the indicator left oversold territory. In 18 of the 22 cases the stock moved higher. This puts the odds of a move higher at 82%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bullish Trend Analysis
Following a +1.18% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where RUSHA advanced for three days, in 229 of 325 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 70%.
RUSHA may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
Bearish Trend Analysis
The Stochastic Oscillator may be shifting from an upward trend to a downward trend. In 43 of 69 cases where RUSHA's Stochastic Oscillator exited the overbought zone, the price fell further within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 62%.
The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on October 28, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on RUSHA as a result. In 49 of 78 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 63%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) for RUSHA turned negative on October 28, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to turn lower in the coming weeks. Traders may want to sell the stock or buy put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 54 similar instances when the indicator turned negative. In 34 of the 54 cases the stock turned lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of success at 63%.
The 50-day moving average for RUSHA moved below the 200-day moving average on October 23, 2026. This could be a long-term bearish signal for the stock as the stock shifts to an downward trend.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where RUSHA declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 61%.
The Aroon Indicator for RUSHA entered a downward trend on November 03, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 14 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to outstanding earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 38 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating well-balanced risk and returns. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 83, placing this stock slightly better than average.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 53 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (2.320) is normal, around the industry mean (1.513). P/E Ratio (20.320) is within average values for comparable stocks, (12.280). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.200) is also within normal values, averaging (0.695). Dividend Yield (0.012) settles around the average of (0.010) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (0.813) is also within normal values, averaging (0.919).
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 58 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. RUSHA’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 65 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
RUSHB in upward trend: price may ascend as a result of having broken its lower Bollinger Band on October 28, 2026
RUSHB may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options. In 32 of 37 cases where RUSHB's price broke its lower Bollinger Band, its price rose further in the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 86%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bullish Trend Analysis
The Stochastic Oscillator suggests the stock price trend may be in a reversal from a downward trend to an upward trend. 45 of 58 cases where RUSHB's Stochastic Oscillator exited the oversold zone resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 78%.
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on November 02, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on RUSHB as a result. In 73 of 99 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 74%.
Following a +3.35% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where RUSHB advanced for three days, in 227 of 327 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 69%.
The Aroon Indicator entered an Uptrend today. In 153 of 243 cases where RUSHB Aroon's Indicator entered an Uptrend, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued Uptrend are 63%.
Bearish Trend Analysis
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) for RUSHB turned negative on October 14, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to turn lower in the coming weeks. Traders may want to sell the stock or buy put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 49 similar instances when the indicator turned negative. In 29 of the 49 cases the stock turned lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of success at 59%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where RUSHB declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 52%.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 7 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to outstanding earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 18 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating low risk on high returns. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 83, placing this stock better than average.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 38 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. RUSHB’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 58 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (3.105) is normal, around the industry mean (1.513). P/E Ratio (27.197) is within average values for comparable stocks, (12.280). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.170) is also within normal values, averaging (0.695). Dividend Yield (0.009) settles around the average of (0.010) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (0.894) is also within normal values, averaging (0.919).
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 65 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 95 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is significantly overvalued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
RUSHA | RUSHB | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 22 | 63 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 53 Fair valued | 58 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 38 | 18 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 65 | 65 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 58 | 38 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 14 | 7 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 90 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
RUSHA's Valuation (53) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is in the same range as RUSHB (58). This means that RUSHA’s stock grew similarly to RUSHB’s over the last 12 months.
RUSHB's Profit vs Risk Rating (18) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is in the same range as RUSHA (38). This means that RUSHB’s stock grew similarly to RUSHA’s over the last 12 months.
RUSHB's SMR Rating (65) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is in the same range as RUSHA (65). This means that RUSHB’s stock grew similarly to RUSHA’s over the last 12 months.
RUSHB's Price Growth Rating (38) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is in the same range as RUSHA (58). This means that RUSHB’s stock grew similarly to RUSHA’s over the last 12 months.
RUSHB's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is in the same range as RUSHA (14). This means that RUSHB’s stock grew similarly to RUSHA’s over the last 12 months.
| RUSHA | RUSHB | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 74% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 59% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 54% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 55% | 2 days ago 68% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 70% | 9 days ago 69% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 61% | 13 days ago 52% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 47% | 2 days ago 63% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
RUSHA’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while RUSHB’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- RUSHA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- RUSHB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
RUSHA’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RUSHB’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- RUSHA’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
- RUSHB’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
Price Growth
RUSHA (@Automotive Aftermarket) experienced а -2.66% price change this week, while RUSHB (@Automotive Aftermarket) price change was -0.49% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Automotive Aftermarket industry was +6.59%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.38%, and the average quarterly price growth was -16.73%.
Reported Earning Dates
RUSHA is expected to report earnings on Feb 17, 2027.
RUSHB is expected to report earnings on Feb 17, 2027.
Industries' Descriptions
@Automotive Aftermarket (+6.59% weekly)The Automotive Aftermarket consists of the manufacturing, remanufacturing, distribution, retailing, and installation of vehicle parts and accessories, after the sale of the automobile by the original equipment manufacturer (OEM) to the consumer. The aftermarket parts many not be manufactured by the OEM. According to a Technavio study, the US automotive parts aftermarket size is estimated to grow by USD 24.33 billion during 2018-2022 (CAGR 3%). Like many other industries, the automotive aftermarket is also being intensely penetrated by the digital boom. The online auto parts sales market is predicted to exceed $13B by 2020 (according to a study by Mirakl).
Advertisement
RUSHA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RUSHA has been closely correlated with RUSHB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RUSHA jumps, then RUSHB could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RUSHA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RUSHA | 100% | -0.45% | ||
| RUSHB - RUSHA | 83% Closely correlated | -0.25% | ||
| ONEW - RUSHA | 60% Loosely correlated | -1.94% | ||
| HVT - RUSHA | 56% Loosely correlated | -3.10% | ||
| HZO - RUSHA | 54% Loosely correlated | -0.09% | ||
| WSM - RUSHA | 53% Loosely correlated | -2.22% | ||
More | ||||
RUSHB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RUSHB has been closely correlated with RUSHA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RUSHB jumps, then RUSHA could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RUSHB | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RUSHB | 100% | -0.25% | ||
| RUSHA - RUSHB | 83% Closely correlated | -0.45% | ||
| ONEW - RUSHB | 54% Loosely correlated | -1.94% | ||
| HVT - RUSHB | 53% Loosely correlated | -3.10% | ||
| HZO - RUSHB | 49% Loosely correlated | -0.09% | ||
| RH - RUSHB | 48% Loosely correlated | -8.46% | ||
More | ||||
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| GDXD | 30.52 | 1.73 | +6.01% |
| MicroSectors Gold Miners - 3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (GDXD) | |||
| ACSG | 45.87 | 0.51 | +1.12% |
| American Century Small Cap Growth Insights ETF (ACSG) | |||
| DWWN | 23.82 | N/A | N/A |
| Principal Long Duration ETF (DWWN) | |||
| DBEF | 54.62 | -0.20 | -0.36% |
| Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF (DBEF) | |||
| ASGI | 20.92 | -0.15 | -0.71% |
| abrdn Global Infrastructure Income Fund | |||