Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RVPHX vs WCMLX
RVPHX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts RVPHX vs WCMLX
RVPHX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RVPHX vs. WCMLX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RVPHX is a Buy and WCMLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RVPHX has more cash in the bank: 212M vs. WCMLX (52.4M). RVPHX pays higher dividends than WCMLX: RVPHX (1.59) vs WCMLX (0.00). RVPHX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: RVPHX (19 years) vs WCMLX (7 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than RVPHX (1.28). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 89.00 vs. RVPHX (75.00). RVPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: RVPHX (2000) vs WCMLX (100000). WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.84 vs. RVPHX (17.20). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : -0.07 vs. RVPHX (-23.86).
| RVPHX | WCMLX | RVPHX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.99 | 103% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 1.79 | 72% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.153 | 9.375 | 172% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 100000 | 2% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 212M | 52.4M | 405% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.59 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.20 | 25.84 | 67% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.11 | 32.13 | 165% |
| Returns for 5 years | -23.86 | -0.07 | 35,939% |
| Returns for 10 years | -12.66 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers