Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RWEBX vs RYDKX
RWEBX vs RYDKX Comparison
Open Charts RWEBX vs RYDKX
RWEBX vs RYDKX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RWEBX vs. RYDKX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RWEBX is a Buy and RYDKX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. RYDKX (23.9M). RWEBX pays higher dividends than RYDKX: RWEBX (0.74) vs RYDKX (0.21). RWEBX was incepted earlier than RYDKX: RWEBX (12 years) vs RYDKX (11 years). RYDKX (2.41) is less costly to investors than RWEBX (1.06). RYDKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 145.00 vs. RWEBX (32.00). RWEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYDKX: RWEBX (250) vs RYDKX (2500). RYDKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.87 vs. RWEBX (1.26). RYDKX return over 5 years is better than : 37.56 vs. RWEBX (23.43).
| RWEBX | RYDKX | RWEBX / RYDKX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 2.35 | 45% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 2.41 | 44% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.934 | 7.818 | 50% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218B | 23.9M | 912,134% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.74 | 0.21 | 349% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.26 | 11.87 | 11% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.16 | 44.74 | 61% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.43 | 37.56 | 62% |
| Returns for 10 years | 75.35 | 129.62 | 58% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement