Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RWEBX vs WTRCX
RWEBX vs WTRCX Comparison
Open Charts RWEBX vs WTRCX
American Funds Washington Mutual R2E
Price$66.91
Change-$0.17 (-0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets209.3B
Macquarie Core Equity Fund
Price$13.35
Change-$0.08 (-0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.92B
RWEBX vs WTRCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RWEBX vs. WTRCX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RWEBX is a Buy and WTRCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 209B vs. WTRCX (3.92B). RWEBX pays higher dividends than WTRCX: RWEBX (0.76) vs WTRCX (0.00). RWEBX was incepted earlier than WTRCX: RWEBX (11 years) vs WTRCX (33 years). WTRCX (1.75) is less costly to investors than RWEBX (1.06). RWEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. WTRCX (24.00). RWEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than WTRCX: RWEBX (250) vs WTRCX (1000). RWEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.21 vs. WTRCX (-0.07). RWEBX return over 5 years is better than : 48.18 vs. WTRCX (3.33).
| RWEBX | WTRCX | RWEBX / WTRCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 1.74 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 1.75 | 61% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.050 | 15.180 | 66% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 209B | 3.92B | 5,329% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.76 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.21 | -0.07 | -8,344% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.84 | 13.22 | 324% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.18 | 3.33 | 1,448% |
| Returns for 10 years | 76.27 | 10.74 | 710% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers