Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RWEBX vs WTRCX
RWEBX vs WTRCX Comparison
Open Charts RWEBX vs WTRCX
American Funds Washington Mutual R2E
Price$64.06
Change+$0.19 (+0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets200.51B
Macquarie Core Equity Fund
Price$12.72
Change+$0.10 (+0.79%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.91B
RWEBX vs WTRCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RWEBX vs. WTRCX commentary
Aug 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RWEBX is a StrongBuy and WTRCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 201B vs. WTRCX (3.91B). RWEBX pays higher dividends than WTRCX: RWEBX (0.79) vs WTRCX (0.00). RWEBX was incepted earlier than WTRCX: RWEBX (11 years) vs WTRCX (33 years). WTRCX (1.75) is less costly to investors than RWEBX (1.06). RWEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. WTRCX (24.00). RWEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than WTRCX: RWEBX (250) vs WTRCX (1000). RWEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.27 vs. WTRCX (3.08). RWEBX return over 5 years is better than : 45.30 vs. WTRCX (1.37).
| RWEBX | WTRCX | RWEBX / WTRCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 1.74 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 1.75 | 61% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.171 | 9.091 | 57% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 201B | 3.91B | 5,146% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.79 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.27 | 3.08 | 301% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.20 | -3.43 | -706% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.30 | 1.37 | 3,302% |
| Returns for 10 years | 64.75 | -0.44 | -14,799% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement