Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RWEBX vs WTRCX
RWEBX vs WTRCX Comparison
Open Charts RWEBX vs WTRCX
RWEBX vs WTRCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RWEBX vs. WTRCX commentary
Jun 20, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RWEBX is a Hold and WTRCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. WTRCX (3.83B). RWEBX pays higher dividends than WTRCX: RWEBX (0.75) vs WTRCX (0.00). RWEBX was incepted earlier than WTRCX: RWEBX (12 years) vs WTRCX (34 years). WTRCX (1.76) is less costly to investors than RWEBX (1.06). RWEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. WTRCX (24.00). RWEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than WTRCX: RWEBX (250) vs WTRCX (1000). RWEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.69 vs. WTRCX (-0.42). RWEBX return over 5 years is better than : 26.05 vs. WTRCX (-21.50).
| RWEBX | WTRCX | RWEBX / WTRCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 1.74 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 1.76 | 60% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 34 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.701 | 10.129 | 17% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218B | 3.83B | 5,698% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.75 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.69 | -0.42 | -1,847% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.49 | 1.94 | 1,210% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.05 | -21.50 | -121% |
| Returns for 10 years | 73.48 | 5.67 | 1,297% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement