Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RWEBX vs WTRCX
RWEBX vs WTRCX Comparison
Open Charts RWEBX vs WTRCX
RWEBX vs WTRCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RWEBX vs. WTRCX commentary
Aug 26, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RWEBX is a StrongBuy and WTRCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. WTRCX (3.79B). RWEBX pays higher dividends than WTRCX: RWEBX (0.75) vs WTRCX (0.00). RWEBX was incepted earlier than WTRCX: RWEBX (12 years) vs WTRCX (34 years). WTRCX (1.76) is less costly to investors than RWEBX (1.06). WTRCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. RWEBX (32.00). RWEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than WTRCX: RWEBX (250) vs WTRCX (1000). RWEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.65 vs. WTRCX (-6.29). RWEBX return over 5 years is better than : 24.65 vs. WTRCX (-28.44).
| RWEBX | WTRCX | RWEBX / WTRCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 1.74 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 1.76 | 60% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 34 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.353 | 11.050 | 57% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218B | 3.79B | 5,752% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.75 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.65 | -6.29 | -90% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.16 | 3.15 | 991% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.65 | -28.44 | -87% |
| Returns for 10 years | 75.91 | 3.10 | 2,453% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement