Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RWMAX vs RWMFX
RWMAX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts RWMAX vs RWMFX
RWMAX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RWMAX vs. RWMFX commentary
Jun 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RWMAX is a Hold and RWMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMAX (218B) and RWMFX (218B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . RWMFX pays higher dividends than RWMAX: RWMFX (1.40) vs RWMAX (0.51). RWMAX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: RWMAX (24 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). RWMAX (1.34) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). RWMAX (29.00) and RWMFX (29.00) have comparable annual turnover. RWMAX (250) and RWMFX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.15 vs. RWMAX (6.88). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 27.55 vs. RWMAX (21.85).
| RWMAX | RWMFX | RWMAX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 0.31 | 432% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 0.31 | 432% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.042 | 1.616 | 64% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218B | 218B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.51 | 1.40 | 36% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.88 | 8.15 | 84% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.16 | 30.58 | 86% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.85 | 27.55 | 79% |
| Returns for 10 years | 72.89 | 82.86 | 88% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement