RWMBX
Price
$67.03
Change
+$0.28 (+0.42%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Net Assets
217.88B
RWMFX
Price
$68.85
Change
+$0.29 (+0.42%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Net Assets
217.88B
Interact to see
Advertisement

RWMBX vs RWMFX

RWMBX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
published Highlights

Market Cap

The average market capitalization across the group is 217.88B. The market cap for tickers in the group ranges from 217.88B to 217.88B. RWMBX holds the highest valuation in this group at 217.88B. The lowest valued company is RWMBX at 217.88B.

High and low price notable news

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the group was -0%. For the same group, the average monthly price growth was -1%, and the average quarterly price growth was 6%. RWMFX experienced the highest price growth at -0%, while RWMBX experienced the biggest fall at -0%.

Volume

The average weekly volume growth across all stocks in the group was 0%. For the same stocks of the group, the average monthly volume growth was 0% and the average quarterly volume growth was 0%

Fundamental Analysis Ratings

The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows

Valuation Rating:
P/E Growth Rating:
Price Growth Rating:
SMR Rating:
Profit Risk Rating:
Seasonality Score: (-100 ... +100)
VS
RWMBX vs. RWMFX commentary
Sep 04, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RWMBX is a StrongBuy and RWMFX is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMBX (218B) and RWMFX (218B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . RWMFX pays higher dividends than RWMBX: RWMFX (1.41) vs RWMBX (0.50). RWMBX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: RWMBX (24 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). RWMBX (1.35) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). RWMBX (32.00) and RWMFX (32.00) have comparable annual turnover. RWMBX (250) and RWMFX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.70 vs. RWMBX (5.40). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 27.50 vs. RWMBX (21.49).
RWMBXRWMFXRWMBX / RWMFX
Total Expense Ratio1.350.31435%
Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio1.350.31435%
Fund Existence24 years24 years-
Gain YTD5.6216.45687%
Front LoadN/AN/A-
Min. Initial Investment250250100%
Min. Initial Investment IRAN/AN/A-
Net Assets218B218B100%
Annual Yield % from dividends0.501.4136%
Returns for 1 year5.406.7081%
Returns for 3 years27.0831.7785%
Returns for 5 years21.4927.5078%
Returns for 10 years70.7081.3487%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TSAMX15.930.12
+0.76%
Thornburg Summit A
FCIWX18.810.05
+0.27%
NYLIM PineStone International Eq Cl R6
SCPAX12.32N/A
N/A
SEI Large Cap Disciplined Eq A (SIIT)
IHOVX25.74N/A
N/A
Hartford International Opportunities R6
GSIHX23.62N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs GQG Ptnrs Intl Opps A