Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RWMFX vs SACVX
RWMFX vs SACVX Comparison
Open Charts RWMFX vs SACVX
RWMFX vs SACVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RWMFX vs. SACVX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RWMFX is a Buy and SACVX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 219B vs. SACVX (241M). SACVX pays higher dividends than RWMFX: SACVX (2.75) vs RWMFX (1.44). RWMFX was incepted earlier than SACVX: RWMFX (24 years) vs SACVX (10 years). SACVX (2.23) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). RWMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. SACVX (10.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than SACVX: RWMFX (250) vs SACVX (500). SACVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.72 vs. RWMFX (5.76). SACVX return over 5 years is better than : 73.61 vs. RWMFX (28.02).
| RWMFX | SACVX | RWMFX / SACVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 2.23 | 14% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 2.23 | 14% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.858 | 13.295 | 29% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 500 | 50% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 219B | 241M | 90,871% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.44 | 2.75 | 52% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.76 | 16.72 | 34% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.17 | 73.08 | 40% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.02 | 73.61 | 38% |
| Returns for 10 years | 77.65 | 208.75 | 37% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement