Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RWMFX vs SCPAX
RWMFX vs SCPAX Comparison
Open Charts RWMFX vs SCPAX
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$67.52
Change+$0.12 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets209.3B
SEI Large Cap Disciplined Eq A (SIIT)
Price$12.01
Change+$0.04 (+0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.44B
RWMFX vs SCPAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RWMFX vs. SCPAX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RWMFX is a Buy and SCPAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 209B vs. SCPAX (1.44B). SCPAX pays higher dividends than RWMFX: SCPAX (2.64) vs RWMFX (1.42). RWMFX was incepted earlier than SCPAX: RWMFX (23 years) vs SCPAX (22 years). SCPAX (0.47) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than SCPAX: RWMFX (250) vs SCPAX (100000). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.50 vs. SCPAX (0.40). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 54.62 vs. SCPAX (24.96).
| RWMFX | SCPAX | RWMFX / SCPAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.18 | 172% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.47 | 66% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.993 | 14.000 | 79% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 209B | 1.44B | 14,504% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.42 | 2.64 | 54% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.50 | 0.40 | 1,620% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.34 | 52.34 | 89% |
| Returns for 5 years | 54.62 | 24.96 | 219% |
| Returns for 10 years | 82.96 | 8.17 | 1,016% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement