Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RWMFX vs SCPAX
RWMFX vs SCPAX Comparison
Open Charts RWMFX vs SCPAX
RWMFX vs SCPAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RWMFX vs. SCPAX commentary
Aug 01, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RWMFX is a Buy and SCPAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 219B vs. SCPAX (1.31B). SCPAX pays higher dividends than RWMFX: SCPAX (2.86) vs RWMFX (1.44). RWMFX was incepted earlier than SCPAX: RWMFX (24 years) vs SCPAX (23 years). SCPAX (0.47) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). SCPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 113.00 vs. RWMFX (29.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than SCPAX: RWMFX (250) vs SCPAX (100000). SCPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.78 vs. RWMFX (7.01). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 28.79 vs. SCPAX (5.85).
| RWMFX | SCPAX | RWMFX / SCPAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.18 | 172% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.47 | 66% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.018 | 11.847 | 42% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 219B | 1.31B | 16,730% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.44 | 2.86 | 50% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.01 | 9.78 | 72% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.01 | 32.74 | 86% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.79 | 5.85 | 492% |
| Returns for 10 years | 80.69 | 17.40 | 464% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers