Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RWMFX vs SCPAX
RWMFX vs SCPAX Comparison
Open Charts RWMFX vs SCPAX
RWMFX vs SCPAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RWMFX vs. SCPAX commentary
Jun 19, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RWMFX is a Hold and SCPAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. SCPAX (1.37B). SCPAX pays higher dividends than RWMFX: SCPAX (2.86) vs RWMFX (1.40). RWMFX was incepted earlier than SCPAX: RWMFX (24 years) vs SCPAX (23 years). SCPAX (0.47) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). SCPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 113.00 vs. RWMFX (29.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than SCPAX: RWMFX (250) vs SCPAX (100000). SCPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.09 vs. RWMFX (7.95). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 29.48 vs. SCPAX (9.49).
| RWMFX | SCPAX | RWMFX / SCPAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.18 | 172% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.47 | 66% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.601 | 9.608 | 17% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218B | 1.37B | 15,924% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.40 | 2.86 | 49% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.95 | 13.09 | 61% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.31 | 35.32 | 80% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.48 | 9.49 | 311% |
| Returns for 10 years | 80.56 | 20.61 | 391% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers