Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RWMFX vs SDLAX
RWMFX vs SDLAX Comparison
Open Charts RWMFX vs SDLAX
RWMFX vs SDLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RWMFX vs. SDLAX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RWMFX is a Hold and SDLAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. SDLAX (2.07B). RWMFX (1.40) and SDLAX (1.37) have matching dividends . RWMFX was incepted earlier than SDLAX: RWMFX (24 years) vs SDLAX (16 years). SDLAX (0.67) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). RWMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. SDLAX (26.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than SDLAX: RWMFX (250) vs SDLAX (100000). SDLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.71 vs. RWMFX (8.15). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 27.55 vs. SDLAX (-3.56).
| RWMFX | SDLAX | RWMFX / SDLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.03 | 1,033% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.67 | 46% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.616 | 8.787 | 18% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218B | 2.07B | 10,542% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.40 | 1.37 | 103% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.15 | 12.71 | 64% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.58 | 10.52 | 291% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.55 | -3.56 | -774% |
| Returns for 10 years | 82.86 | 74.02 | 112% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement