Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RWMFX vs SDLAX
RWMFX vs SDLAX Comparison
Open Charts RWMFX vs SDLAX
RWMFX vs SDLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RWMFX vs. SDLAX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RWMFX is a Buy and SDLAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. SDLAX (2.08B). RWMFX (1.41) and SDLAX (1.34) have matching dividends . RWMFX was incepted earlier than SDLAX: RWMFX (24 years) vs SDLAX (16 years). SDLAX (0.67) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). RWMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. SDLAX (19.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than SDLAX: RWMFX (250) vs SDLAX (100000). SDLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.55 vs. RWMFX (2.09). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 27.39 vs. SDLAX (-6.73).
| RWMFX | SDLAX | RWMFX / SDLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.03 | 1,033% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.67 | 46% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.508 | 11.245 | 40% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218B | 2.08B | 10,471% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.41 | 1.34 | 105% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.09 | 3.55 | 59% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.24 | 9.63 | 314% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.39 | -6.73 | -407% |
| Returns for 10 years | 82.36 | 69.87 | 118% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers