Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RWMFX vs SEHAX
RWMFX vs SEHAX Comparison
Open Charts RWMFX vs SEHAX
RWMFX vs SEHAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RWMFX vs. SEHAX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RWMFX is a Hold and SEHAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 214B vs. SEHAX (3.91B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than SEHAX: RWMFX (1.40) vs SEHAX (1.17). RWMFX was incepted earlier than SEHAX: RWMFX (24 years) vs SEHAX (8 years). SEHAX (0.32) and RWMFX (0.31) have similar cost to investors . SEHAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 47.00 vs. RWMFX (29.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than SEHAX: RWMFX (250) vs SEHAX (100000). SEHAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.79 vs. RWMFX (8.10). RWMFX (26.71) and SEHAX (26.04) have equivalent 5 years return.
| RWMFX | SEHAX | RWMFX / SEHAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.02 | 1,550% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.32 | 97% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.575 | 12.985 | 43% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 214B | 3.91B | 5,476% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.40 | 1.17 | 120% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.10 | 24.79 | 33% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.11 | 69.57 | 48% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.71 | 26.04 | 103% |
| Returns for 10 years | 85.42 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement