Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RWMFX vs SHAPX
RWMFX vs SHAPX Comparison
Open Charts RWMFX vs SHAPX
RWMFX vs SHAPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RWMFX vs. SHAPX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RWMFX is a Hold and SHAPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. SHAPX (9.59B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than SHAPX: RWMFX (1.40) vs SHAPX (0.28). RWMFX was incepted earlier than SHAPX: RWMFX (24 years) vs SHAPX (56 years). SHAPX (0.91) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). RWMFX (29.00) and SHAPX (28.00) have comparable annual turnover. RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than SHAPX: RWMFX (250) vs SHAPX (1000). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.03 vs. SHAPX (2.71). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 26.38 vs. SHAPX (16.29).
| RWMFX | SHAPX | RWMFX / SHAPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.91 | 34% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.91 | 34% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 56 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.322 | 5.236 | 25% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218B | 9.59B | 2,274% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.40 | 0.28 | 502% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.03 | 2.71 | 259% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.20 | 25.07 | 120% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.38 | 16.29 | 162% |
| Returns for 10 years | 82.33 | 94.51 | 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement