Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RWMFX vs SLCAX
RWMFX vs SLCAX Comparison
Open Charts RWMFX vs SLCAX
RWMFX vs SLCAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RWMFX vs. SLCAX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RWMFX is a Hold and SLCAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 214B vs. SLCAX (638M). RWMFX pays higher dividends than SLCAX: RWMFX (1.40) vs SLCAX (1.11). RWMFX was incepted earlier than SLCAX: RWMFX (24 years) vs SLCAX (30 years). SLCAX (0.47) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). SLCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.00 vs. RWMFX (29.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than SLCAX: RWMFX (250) vs SLCAX (100000). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.10 vs. SLCAX (-6.03). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 26.71 vs. SLCAX (-18.00).
| RWMFX | SLCAX | RWMFX / SLCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.18 | 172% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.47 | 66% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.575 | 11.065 | 50% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 214B | 638M | 33,542% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.40 | 1.11 | 126% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.10 | -6.03 | -134% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.11 | 11.41 | 290% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.71 | -18.00 | -148% |
| Returns for 10 years | 85.42 | -11.50 | -743% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement