Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RWMFX vs SLCAX
RWMFX vs SLCAX Comparison
Open Charts RWMFX vs SLCAX
RWMFX vs SLCAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RWMFX vs. SLCAX commentary
Jul 01, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RWMFX is a Hold and SLCAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. SLCAX (640M). RWMFX pays higher dividends than SLCAX: RWMFX (1.40) vs SLCAX (1.11). RWMFX was incepted earlier than SLCAX: RWMFX (24 years) vs SLCAX (30 years). SLCAX (0.47) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). SLCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.00 vs. RWMFX (29.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than SLCAX: RWMFX (250) vs SLCAX (100000). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.36 vs. SLCAX (-10.62). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 27.84 vs. SLCAX (-19.66).
| RWMFX | SLCAX | RWMFX / SLCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.18 | 172% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.47 | 66% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.379 | 10.213 | 33% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218B | 640M | 34,063% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.40 | 1.11 | 126% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.36 | -10.62 | -60% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.90 | 6.16 | 485% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.84 | -19.66 | -142% |
| Returns for 10 years | 80.79 | -10.72 | -754% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement