Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RWMFX vs SPINX
RWMFX vs SPINX Comparison
Open Charts RWMFX vs SPINX
RWMFX vs SPINX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RWMFX vs. SPINX commentary
Jul 10, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RWMFX is a Buy and SPINX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. SPINX (4.31B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than SPINX: RWMFX (1.44) vs SPINX (1.01). RWMFX was incepted earlier than SPINX: RWMFX (24 years) vs SPINX (13 years). RWMFX (0.31) is less costly to investors than SPINX (0.12). RWMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. SPINX (5.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than SPINX: RWMFX (250) vs SPINX (100000). SPINX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.12 vs. RWMFX (5.41). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 27.29 vs. SPINX (6.53).
| RWMFX | SPINX | RWMFX / SPINX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.05 | 620% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.12 | 258% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.487 | 9.943 | 35% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218B | 4.31B | 5,062% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.44 | 1.01 | 142% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.41 | 9.12 | 59% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.20 | 18.19 | 171% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.29 | 6.53 | 418% |
| Returns for 10 years | 78.80 | 124.82 | 63% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement