Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RWMFX vs SPINX
RWMFX vs SPINX Comparison
Open Charts RWMFX vs SPINX
RWMFX vs SPINX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RWMFX vs. SPINX commentary
Jun 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RWMFX is a Hold and SPINX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 214B vs. SPINX (4.52B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than SPINX: RWMFX (1.40) vs SPINX (1.00). RWMFX was incepted earlier than SPINX: RWMFX (24 years) vs SPINX (12 years). RWMFX (0.31) is less costly to investors than SPINX (0.12). RWMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. SPINX (5.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than SPINX: RWMFX (250) vs SPINX (100000). SPINX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.92 vs. RWMFX (8.10). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 26.71 vs. SPINX (12.76).
| RWMFX | SPINX | RWMFX / SPINX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.05 | 620% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.12 | 258% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.575 | 11.503 | 48% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 214B | 4.52B | 4,733% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.40 | 1.00 | 140% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.10 | 16.92 | 48% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.11 | 23.63 | 140% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.71 | 12.76 | 209% |
| Returns for 10 years | 85.42 | 132.69 | 64% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement