Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RWMFX vs SPISX
RWMFX vs SPISX Comparison
Open Charts RWMFX vs SPISX
RWMFX vs SPISX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RWMFX vs. SPISX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RWMFX is a Buy and SPISX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. SPISX (4.82B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than SPISX: RWMFX (1.41) vs SPISX (0.73). RWMFX was incepted earlier than SPISX: RWMFX (24 years) vs SPISX (9 years). RWMFX (0.31) is less costly to investors than SPISX (0.19). RWMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. SPISX (2.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than SPISX: RWMFX (250) vs SPISX (1000000). SPISX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.08 vs. RWMFX (2.09). SPISX return over 5 years is better than : 78.05 vs. RWMFX (27.39).
| RWMFX | SPISX | RWMFX / SPISX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.19 | 163% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.19 | 163% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.508 | 11.656 | 39% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218B | 4.82B | 4,521% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.41 | 0.73 | 194% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.09 | 16.08 | 13% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.24 | 74.93 | 40% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.39 | 78.05 | 35% |
| Returns for 10 years | 82.36 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers