Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RWMFX vs SSFRX
RWMFX vs SSFRX Comparison
Open Charts RWMFX vs SSFRX
RWMFX vs SSFRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RWMFX vs. SSFRX commentary
Sep 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RWMFX is a Buy and SSFRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. SSFRX (16.7B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than SSFRX: RWMFX (1.41) vs SSFRX (0.55). RWMFX was incepted earlier than SSFRX: RWMFX (24 years) vs SSFRX (21 years). SSFRX (0.69) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). RWMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. SSFRX (2.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSFRX: RWMFX (250) vs SSFRX (25000000). SSFRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.62 vs. RWMFX (2.09). SSFRX return over 5 years is better than : 73.42 vs. RWMFX (27.39).
| RWMFX | SSFRX | RWMFX / SSFRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.62 | 50% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.69 | 45% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.508 | 12.268 | 37% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 25000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218B | 16.7B | 1,305% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.41 | 0.55 | 256% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.09 | 16.62 | 13% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.24 | 74.16 | 41% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.39 | 73.42 | 37% |
| Returns for 10 years | 82.36 | 244.93 | 34% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers