Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RWMFX vs SSSVX
RWMFX vs SSSVX Comparison
Open Charts RWMFX vs SSSVX
RWMFX vs SSSVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RWMFX vs. SSSVX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RWMFX is a Buy and SSSVX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. SSSVX (16.6B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than SSSVX: RWMFX (1.41) vs SSSVX (0.71). RWMFX was incepted earlier than SSSVX: RWMFX (24 years) vs SSSVX (12 years). SSSVX (0.54) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). RWMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. SSSVX (2.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSSVX: RWMFX (250) vs SSSVX (2000). SSSVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.83 vs. RWMFX (2.09). SSSVX return over 5 years is better than : 73.33 vs. RWMFX (27.39).
| RWMFX | SSSVX | RWMFX / SSSVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.47 | 66% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.54 | 57% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.508 | 11.428 | 39% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218B | 16.6B | 1,313% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.41 | 0.71 | 197% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.09 | 15.83 | 13% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.24 | 73.55 | 41% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.39 | 73.33 | 37% |
| Returns for 10 years | 82.36 | 246.89 | 33% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement