Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RWMFX vs SSSVX
RWMFX vs SSSVX Comparison
Open Charts RWMFX vs SSSVX
RWMFX vs SSSVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RWMFX vs. SSSVX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RWMFX is a Buy and SSSVX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 219B vs. SSSVX (16.2B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than SSSVX: RWMFX (1.42) vs SSSVX (0.73). RWMFX was incepted earlier than SSSVX: RWMFX (24 years) vs SSSVX (12 years). SSSVX (0.54) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). RWMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. SSSVX (2.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSSVX: RWMFX (250) vs SSSVX (2000). SSSVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.78 vs. RWMFX (7.01). SSSVX return over 5 years is better than : 73.53 vs. RWMFX (28.79).
| RWMFX | SSSVX | RWMFX / SSSVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.47 | 66% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.54 | 57% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.018 | 9.833 | 51% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 219B | 16.2B | 1,352% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.42 | 0.73 | 194% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.01 | 18.78 | 37% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.01 | 67.08 | 42% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.79 | 73.53 | 39% |
| Returns for 10 years | 80.69 | 238.08 | 34% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement