Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RWMFX vs STFAX
RWMFX vs STFAX Comparison
Open Charts RWMFX vs STFAX
RWMFX vs STFAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RWMFX vs. STFAX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RWMFX is a Buy and STFAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. STFAX (16.6B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than STFAX: RWMFX (1.41) vs STFAX (0.96). RWMFX was incepted earlier than STFAX: RWMFX (24 years) vs STFAX (25 years). RWMFX (0.31) is less costly to investors than STFAX (0.24). RWMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. STFAX (2.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than STFAX: RWMFX (250) vs STFAX (25000000). STFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.14 vs. RWMFX (2.09). STFAX return over 5 years is better than : 75.85 vs. RWMFX (27.39).
| RWMFX | STFAX | RWMFX / STFAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.17 | 182% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.24 | 129% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.508 | 11.658 | 39% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 25000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218B | 16.6B | 1,313% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.41 | 0.96 | 147% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.09 | 16.14 | 13% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.24 | 75.02 | 40% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.39 | 75.85 | 36% |
| Returns for 10 years | 82.36 | 256.18 | 32% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement