Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RWMFX vs STFGX
RWMFX vs STFGX Comparison
Open Charts RWMFX vs STFGX
RWMFX vs STFGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RWMFX vs. STFGX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RWMFX is a Buy and STFGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. STFGX (9.88B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than STFGX: RWMFX (1.41) vs STFGX (1.23). RWMFX was incepted earlier than STFGX: RWMFX (24 years) vs STFGX (59 years). RWMFX (0.31) is less costly to investors than STFGX (0.15). RWMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. STFGX (29.00). RWMFX (250) and STFGX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. STFGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.95 vs. RWMFX (2.09). STFGX return over 5 years is better than : 37.88 vs. RWMFX (27.39).
| RWMFX | STFGX | RWMFX / STFGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.12 | 258% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.15 | 207% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 59 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.508 | 13.777 | 33% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218B | 9.88B | 2,206% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.41 | 1.23 | 114% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.09 | 14.95 | 14% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.24 | 46.47 | 65% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.39 | 37.88 | 72% |
| Returns for 10 years | 82.36 | 151.81 | 54% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement