Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RWMFX vs TIGRX
RWMFX vs TIGRX Comparison
Open Charts RWMFX vs TIGRX
RWMFX vs TIGRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RWMFX vs. TIGRX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RWMFX is a Buy and TIGRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. TIGRX (6.76B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than TIGRX: RWMFX (1.41) vs TIGRX (0.70). RWMFX was incepted earlier than TIGRX: RWMFX (24 years) vs TIGRX (27 years). TIGRX (0.40) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). TIGRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 117.00 vs. RWMFX (32.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than TIGRX: RWMFX (250) vs TIGRX (1000000). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.09 vs. TIGRX (-2.18). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 27.39 vs. TIGRX (-14.45).
| RWMFX | TIGRX | RWMFX / TIGRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.40 | 77% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.40 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.508 | 6.719 | 67% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218B | 6.76B | 3,227% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.41 | 0.70 | 202% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.09 | -2.18 | -96% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.24 | 9.82 | 308% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.39 | -14.45 | -190% |
| Returns for 10 years | 82.36 | 46.00 | 179% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement