Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RWMFX vs TLASX
RWMFX vs TLASX Comparison
Open Charts RWMFX vs TLASX
RWMFX vs TLASX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 219B vs. TLASX (181M). RWMFX pays higher dividends than TLASX: RWMFX (1.44) vs TLASX (0.59). RWMFX was incepted earlier than TLASX: RWMFX (24 years) vs TLASX (3 years). TLASX (0.55) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). TLASX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 110.00 vs. RWMFX (29.00). TLASX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWMFX: TLASX (0) vs RWMFX (250). TLASX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.67 vs. RWMFX (5.76).
| RWMFX | TLASX | RWMFX / TLASX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.55 | 56% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.55 | 56% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 3 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.858 | 11.396 | 34% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 219B | 181M | 120,994% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.44 | 0.59 | 242% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.76 | 6.67 | 86% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.17 | 13.54 | 215% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.02 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | 77.65 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers