Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RWMFX vs TRPGX
RWMFX vs TRPGX Comparison
Open Charts RWMFX vs TRPGX
RWMFX vs TRPGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RWMFX vs. TRPGX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RWMFX is a Hold and TRPGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 214B vs. TRPGX (7.21B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than TRPGX: RWMFX (1.40) vs TRPGX (0.57). RWMFX was incepted earlier than TRPGX: RWMFX (24 years) vs TRPGX (17 years). TRPGX (0.55) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). TRPGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 117.00 vs. RWMFX (29.00). TRPGX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWMFX: TRPGX (0) vs RWMFX (250). TRPGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.36 vs. RWMFX (7.92). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 26.49 vs. TRPGX (-7.87).
| RWMFX | TRPGX | RWMFX / TRPGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.55 | 56% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.55 | 56% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.991 | 8.486 | 71% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 214B | 7.21B | 2,966% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.40 | 0.57 | 246% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.92 | 11.36 | 70% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.64 | 16.78 | 200% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.49 | -7.87 | -337% |
| Returns for 10 years | 86.15 | 48.73 | 177% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement