Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RWMFX vs TRSPX
RWMFX vs TRSPX Comparison
Open Charts RWMFX vs TRSPX
RWMFX vs TRSPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RWMFX vs. TRSPX commentary
Jul 28, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RWMFX is a Buy and TRSPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 219B vs. TRSPX (13.6B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than TRSPX: RWMFX (1.44) vs TRSPX (0.83). RWMFX was incepted earlier than TRSPX: RWMFX (24 years) vs TRSPX (24 years). RWMFX (0.31) and TRSPX (0.30) have similar cost to investors . RWMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. TRSPX (8.00). TRSPX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWMFX: TRSPX (0) vs RWMFX (250). TRSPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.62 vs. RWMFX (5.29). TRSPX return over 5 years is better than : 71.96 vs. RWMFX (28.84).
| RWMFX | TRSPX | RWMFX / TRSPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.30 | 103% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.30 | 103% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.709 | 8.801 | 53% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 219B | 13.6B | 1,610% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.44 | 0.83 | 173% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.29 | 15.62 | 34% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.56 | 64.41 | 43% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.84 | 71.96 | 40% |
| Returns for 10 years | 78.79 | 252.06 | 31% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement