Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RWMFX vs TRSPX
RWMFX vs TRSPX Comparison
Open Charts RWMFX vs TRSPX
RWMFX vs TRSPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RWMFX vs. TRSPX commentary
Sep 07, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RWMFX is a StrongBuy and TRSPX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. TRSPX (14.1B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than TRSPX: RWMFX (1.41) vs TRSPX (0.81). RWMFX was incepted earlier than TRSPX: RWMFX (24 years) vs TRSPX (24 years). RWMFX (0.31) and TRSPX (0.30) have similar cost to investors . RWMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. TRSPX (8.00). TRSPX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWMFX: TRSPX (0) vs RWMFX (250). TRSPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.28 vs. RWMFX (5.49). TRSPX return over 5 years is better than : 73.68 vs. RWMFX (26.78).
| RWMFX | TRSPX | RWMFX / TRSPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.30 | 103% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.30 | 103% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.853 | 13.421 | 44% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218B | 14.1B | 1,546% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.41 | 0.81 | 174% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.49 | 18.28 | 30% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.74 | 74.36 | 43% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.78 | 73.68 | 36% |
| Returns for 10 years | 79.92 | 264.01 | 30% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers