Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RWMFX vs TRZDX
RWMFX vs TRZDX Comparison
Open Charts RWMFX vs TRZDX
RWMFX vs TRZDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 219B vs. TRZDX (23.8B). RWMFX (1.44) and TRZDX (1.42) have matching dividends . RWMFX was incepted earlier than TRZDX: RWMFX (24 years) vs TRZDX (5 years). TRZDX (0.49) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). RWMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. TRZDX (9.70). TRZDX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWMFX: TRZDX (0) vs RWMFX (250). TRZDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.84 vs. RWMFX (6.51). TRZDX return over 5 years is better than : 42.52 vs. RWMFX (29.44).
| RWMFX | TRZDX | RWMFX / TRZDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.00 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.49 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.090 | 10.537 | 39% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 219B | 23.8B | 920% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.44 | 1.42 | 102% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.51 | 10.84 | 60% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.45 | 37.86 | 78% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.44 | 42.52 | 69% |
| Returns for 10 years | 78.04 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement