Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RWMFX vs TRZLX
RWMFX vs TRZLX Comparison
Open Charts RWMFX vs TRZLX
RWMFX vs TRZLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RWMFX vs. TRZLX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RWMFX is a Hold and TRZLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. TRZLX (17.9B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than TRZLX: RWMFX (1.40) vs TRZLX (0.99). RWMFX was incepted earlier than TRZLX: RWMFX (24 years) vs TRZLX (6 years). TRZLX (0.54) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). TRZLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 65.40 vs. RWMFX (29.00). TRZLX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWMFX: TRZLX (0) vs RWMFX (250). TRZLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.38 vs. RWMFX (7.03). TRZLX return over 5 years is better than : 41.31 vs. RWMFX (26.38).
| RWMFX | TRZLX | RWMFX / TRZLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.00 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.54 | 57% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.322 | 8.110 | 16% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218B | 17.9B | 1,218% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.40 | 0.99 | 142% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.03 | 12.38 | 57% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.20 | 50.46 | 60% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.38 | 41.31 | 64% |
| Returns for 10 years | 82.33 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement