Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RWMFX vs TRZLX
RWMFX vs TRZLX Comparison
Open Charts RWMFX vs TRZLX
RWMFX vs TRZLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RWMFX vs. TRZLX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RWMFX is a Buy and TRZLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. TRZLX (18.2B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than TRZLX: RWMFX (1.41) vs TRZLX (0.95). RWMFX was incepted earlier than TRZLX: RWMFX (24 years) vs TRZLX (6 years). TRZLX (0.54) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). TRZLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 65.40 vs. RWMFX (32.00). TRZLX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWMFX: TRZLX (0) vs RWMFX (250). TRZLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.58 vs. RWMFX (2.09). TRZLX return over 5 years is better than : 39.36 vs. RWMFX (27.39).
| RWMFX | TRZLX | RWMFX / TRZLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.00 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.54 | 57% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.508 | 12.015 | 38% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218B | 18.2B | 1,198% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.41 | 0.95 | 149% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.09 | 6.58 | 32% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.24 | 50.27 | 60% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.39 | 39.36 | 70% |
| Returns for 10 years | 82.36 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers