Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RWMFX vs WCEAX
RWMFX vs WCEAX Comparison
Open Charts RWMFX vs WCEAX
RWMFX vs WCEAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RWMFX vs. WCEAX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RWMFX is a Buy and WCEAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. WCEAX (3.69B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than WCEAX: RWMFX (1.41) vs WCEAX (0.18). RWMFX was incepted earlier than WCEAX: RWMFX (24 years) vs WCEAX (26 years). WCEAX (1.01) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). WCEAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. RWMFX (32.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCEAX: RWMFX (250) vs WCEAX (1000). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.09 vs. WCEAX (-2.75). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 27.39 vs. WCEAX (-7.02).
| RWMFX | WCEAX | RWMFX / WCEAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.99 | 31% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 1.01 | 31% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.508 | 9.994 | 45% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218B | 3.69B | 5,905% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.41 | 0.18 | 789% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.09 | -2.75 | -76% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.24 | 20.27 | 149% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.39 | -7.02 | -390% |
| Returns for 10 years | 82.36 | 47.83 | 172% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers