Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RWMFX vs WFILX
RWMFX vs WFILX Comparison
Open Charts RWMFX vs WFILX
RWMFX vs WFILX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RWMFX vs. WFILX commentary
Jul 17, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RWMFX is a Hold and WFILX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 219B vs. WFILX (1.55B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than WFILX: RWMFX (1.44) vs WFILX (0.70). RWMFX was incepted earlier than WFILX: RWMFX (24 years) vs WFILX (28 years). WFILX (0.62) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). RWMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. WFILX (3.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than WFILX: RWMFX (250) vs WFILX (1000). WFILX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.64 vs. RWMFX (6.66). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 30.13 vs. WFILX (26.64).
| RWMFX | WFILX | RWMFX / WFILX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.44 | 70% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.62 | 50% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.647 | 11.041 | 42% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 219B | 1.55B | 14,175% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.44 | 0.70 | 206% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.66 | 14.64 | 46% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.74 | 41.43 | 72% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.13 | 26.64 | 113% |
| Returns for 10 years | 78.65 | 4.18 | 1,881% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement