Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RWMFX vs WFILX
RWMFX vs WFILX Comparison
Open Charts RWMFX vs WFILX
RWMFX vs WFILX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RWMFX vs. WFILX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RWMFX is a Hold and WFILX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. WFILX (1.53B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than WFILX: RWMFX (1.40) vs WFILX (0.69). RWMFX was incepted earlier than WFILX: RWMFX (24 years) vs WFILX (28 years). WFILX (0.63) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). RWMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. WFILX (3.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than WFILX: RWMFX (250) vs WFILX (1000). WFILX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.21 vs. RWMFX (8.15). WFILX (27.99) and RWMFX (27.55) have equivalent 5 years return.
| RWMFX | WFILX | RWMFX / WFILX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.44 | 70% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.63 | 49% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.616 | 9.965 | 16% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218B | 1.53B | 14,258% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.40 | 0.69 | 202% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.15 | 19.21 | 42% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.58 | 45.75 | 67% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.55 | 27.99 | 98% |
| Returns for 10 years | 82.86 | 9.84 | 842% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement