Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RWMFX vs WFILX
RWMFX vs WFILX Comparison
Open Charts RWMFX vs WFILX
RWMFX vs WFILX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RWMFX vs. WFILX commentary
Aug 30, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RWMFX is a StrongBuy and WFILX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. WFILX (1.56B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than WFILX: RWMFX (1.42) vs WFILX (0.70). RWMFX was incepted earlier than WFILX: RWMFX (24 years) vs WFILX (28 years). WFILX (0.62) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). RWMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. WFILX (3.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than WFILX: RWMFX (250) vs WFILX (1000). WFILX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.75 vs. RWMFX (5.83). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 27.77 vs. WFILX (24.02).
| RWMFX | WFILX | RWMFX / WFILX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.44 | 70% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.62 | 50% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.549 | 13.457 | 49% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218B | 1.56B | 13,974% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.42 | 0.70 | 202% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.83 | 12.75 | 46% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.74 | 45.14 | 70% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.77 | 24.02 | 116% |
| Returns for 10 years | 81.94 | 5.75 | 1,425% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement