Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RWMFX vs WOGSX
RWMFX vs WOGSX Comparison
Open Charts RWMFX vs WOGSX
RWMFX vs WOGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RWMFX vs. WOGSX commentary
Sep 20, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RWMFX is a Hold and WOGSX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. WOGSX (475M). RWMFX pays higher dividends than WOGSX: RWMFX (1.41) vs WOGSX (0.44). RWMFX was incepted earlier than WOGSX: RWMFX (24 years) vs WOGSX (34 years). WOGSX (0.90) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). RWMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. WOGSX (11.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than WOGSX: RWMFX (250) vs WOGSX (2000). WOGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.94 vs. RWMFX (1.33). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 26.42 vs. WOGSX (23.08).
| RWMFX | WOGSX | RWMFX / WOGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.90 | 34% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.90 | 34% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 34 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.404 | 9.139 | 37% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218B | 475M | 45,895% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.41 | 0.44 | 324% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.33 | 6.94 | 19% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.00 | 38.54 | 75% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.42 | 23.08 | 115% |
| Returns for 10 years | 80.74 | 167.75 | 48% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement