Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RWMFX vs WPVLX
RWMFX vs WPVLX Comparison
Open Charts RWMFX vs WPVLX
RWMFX vs WPVLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
A.I.Advisor
published Highlights
Market Cap
The average market capitalization across the group is 109.19B. The market cap for tickers in the group ranges from 502.59M to 217.88B. RWMFX holds the highest valuation in this group at 217.88B. The lowest valued company is WPVLX at 502.59M.
High and low price notable news
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the group was -1%. For the same group, the average monthly price growth was -2%, and the average quarterly price growth was 6%. RWMFX experienced the highest price growth at -1%, while WPVLX experienced the biggest fall at -1%.
Volume
The average weekly volume growth across all stocks in the group was 0%. For the same stocks of the group, the average monthly volume growth was 0% and the average quarterly volume growth was 0%
Fundamental Analysis Ratings
The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows
Valuation Rating:
P/E Growth Rating:
Price Growth Rating:
SMR Rating:
Profit Risk Rating:
Seasonality Score: (-100 ... +100)
RWMFX vs. WPVLX commentary
Sep 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RWMFX is a StrongBuy and WPVLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. WPVLX (503M). RWMFX pays higher dividends than WPVLX: RWMFX (1.41) vs WPVLX (0.01). RWMFX was incepted earlier than WPVLX: RWMFX (24 years) vs WPVLX (43 years). WPVLX (1.06) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). RWMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. WPVLX (11.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than WPVLX: RWMFX (250) vs WPVLX (2500). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.49 vs. WPVLX (-8.79). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 26.78 vs. WPVLX (-15.99).
| RWMFX | WPVLX | RWMFX / WPVLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 1.06 | 29% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 1.06 | 29% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 43 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.853 | 1.607 | 364% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218B | 503M | 43,340% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.41 | 0.01 | 9,550% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.49 | -8.79 | -62% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.74 | 5.82 | 545% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.78 | -15.99 | -168% |
| Returns for 10 years | 79.92 | 8.30 | 963% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers