Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RWMFX vs WPVLX
RWMFX vs WPVLX Comparison
Open Charts RWMFX vs WPVLX
RWMFX vs WPVLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RWMFX vs. WPVLX commentary
Jun 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RWMFX is a Hold and WPVLX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 214B vs. WPVLX (489M). RWMFX pays higher dividends than WPVLX: RWMFX (1.40) vs WPVLX (0.02). RWMFX was incepted earlier than WPVLX: RWMFX (24 years) vs WPVLX (43 years). WPVLX (1.06) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). RWMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. WPVLX (16.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than WPVLX: RWMFX (250) vs WPVLX (2500). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.10 vs. WPVLX (-10.82). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 26.71 vs. WPVLX (-16.54).
| RWMFX | WPVLX | RWMFX / WPVLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 1.06 | 29% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 1.06 | 29% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 43 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.575 | -3.608 | -155% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 214B | 489M | 43,763% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.40 | 0.02 | 9,142% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.10 | -10.82 | -75% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.11 | 7.91 | 419% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.71 | -16.54 | -162% |
| Returns for 10 years | 85.42 | 4.91 | 1,741% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement