Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RWMFX vs WSHFX
RWMFX vs WSHFX Comparison
Open Charts RWMFX vs WSHFX
RWMFX vs WSHFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RWMFX vs. WSHFX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RWMFX is a Hold and WSHFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX (218B) and WSHFX (218B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . RWMFX pays higher dividends than WSHFX: RWMFX (1.40) vs WSHFX (1.14). RWMFX was incepted earlier than WSHFX: RWMFX (24 years) vs WSHFX (25 years). WSHFX (0.63) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). RWMFX (29.00) and WSHFX (29.00) have comparable annual turnover. RWMFX (250) and WSHFX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. WSHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.75 vs. RWMFX (7.03). RWMFX (26.38) and WSHFX (25.78) have equivalent 5 years return.
| RWMFX | WSHFX | RWMFX / WSHFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.63 | 49% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.63 | 49% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.322 | 1.434 | 92% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218B | 218B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.40 | 1.14 | 123% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.03 | 7.75 | 91% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.20 | 29.21 | 103% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.38 | 25.78 | 102% |
| Returns for 10 years | 82.33 | 79.73 | 103% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement