Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RWMHX vs SVFAX
RWMHX vs SVFAX Comparison
Open Charts RWMHX vs SVFAX
RWMHX vs SVFAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RWMHX vs. SVFAX commentary
Aug 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RWMHX is a StrongBuy and SVFAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMHX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. SVFAX (4.28B). SVFAX (1.40) and RWMHX (1.34) have matching dividends . RWMHX was incepted earlier than SVFAX: RWMHX (11 years) vs SVFAX (13 years). SVFAX (1.23) is less costly to investors than RWMHX (0.41). RWMHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. SVFAX (16.25). RWMHX has a lower initial minimum investment than SVFAX: RWMHX (250) vs SVFAX (3000). SVFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 31.71 vs. RWMHX (7.41). SVFAX return over 5 years is better than : 66.01 vs. RWMHX (28.75).
| RWMHX | SVFAX | RWMHX / SVFAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 1.23 | 33% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 1.23 | 33% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.557 | 26.656 | 25% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 3000 | 8% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218B | 4.28B | 5,096% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.34 | 1.40 | 95% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.41 | 31.71 | 23% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.75 | 56.12 | 60% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.75 | 66.01 | 44% |
| Returns for 10 years | 79.77 | 184.99 | 43% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers