Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RWMHX vs SVFDX
RWMHX vs SVFDX Comparison
Open Charts RWMHX vs SVFDX
RWMHX vs SVFDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RWMHX vs. SVFDX commentary
Jun 21, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RWMHX is a Hold and SVFDX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMHX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. SVFDX (3.89B). RWMHX pays higher dividends than SVFDX: RWMHX (1.32) vs SVFDX (1.19). RWMHX was incepted earlier than SVFDX: RWMHX (11 years) vs SVFDX (12 years). SVFDX (2.91) is less costly to investors than RWMHX (0.41). RWMHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. SVFDX (16.25). RWMHX has a lower initial minimum investment than SVFDX: RWMHX (250) vs SVFDX (25000). SVFDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 26.12 vs. RWMHX (8.40). SVFDX return over 5 years is better than : 51.97 vs. RWMHX (29.52).
| RWMHX | SVFDX | RWMHX / SVFDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 1.60 | 26% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 2.91 | 14% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.020 | 13.514 | 15% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 25000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218B | 3.89B | 5,608% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.32 | 1.19 | 111% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.40 | 26.12 | 32% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.23 | 38.05 | 64% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.52 | 51.97 | 57% |
| Returns for 10 years | 79.27 | 158.86 | 50% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement