Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RWMHX vs ZDIIX
RWMHX vs ZDIIX Comparison
Open Charts RWMHX vs ZDIIX
RWMHX vs ZDIIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RWMHX vs. ZDIIX commentary
Aug 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RWMHX is a Buy and ZDIIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMHX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. ZDIIX (147M). ZDIIX pays higher dividends than RWMHX: ZDIIX (1.52) vs RWMHX (1.34). RWMHX was incepted earlier than ZDIIX: RWMHX (11 years) vs ZDIIX (10 years). ZDIIX (1.16) is less costly to investors than RWMHX (0.41). RWMHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. ZDIIX (17.00). RWMHX has a lower initial minimum investment than ZDIIX: RWMHX (250) vs ZDIIX (5000). ZDIIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.24 vs. RWMHX (7.79). ZDIIX return over 5 years is better than : 41.35 vs. RWMHX (28.74).
| RWMHX | ZDIIX | RWMHX / ZDIIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 1.06 | 39% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 1.16 | 35% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.331 | 15.827 | 46% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 5000 | 5% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218B | 147M | 148,299% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.34 | 1.52 | 88% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.79 | 20.24 | 38% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.44 | 47.36 | 68% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.74 | 41.35 | 70% |
| Returns for 10 years | 81.08 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement