Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RWMHX vs ZDIIX
RWMHX vs ZDIIX Comparison
Open Charts RWMHX vs ZDIIX
RWMHX vs ZDIIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RWMHX vs. ZDIIX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RWMHX is a Hold and ZDIIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMHX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. ZDIIX (139M). ZDIIX pays higher dividends than RWMHX: ZDIIX (1.58) vs RWMHX (1.32). RWMHX was incepted earlier than ZDIIX: RWMHX (11 years) vs ZDIIX (9 years). ZDIIX (1.16) is less costly to investors than RWMHX (0.41). RWMHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. ZDIIX (17.00). RWMHX has a lower initial minimum investment than ZDIIX: RWMHX (250) vs ZDIIX (5000). ZDIIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.66 vs. RWMHX (8.01). ZDIIX return over 5 years is better than : 39.23 vs. RWMHX (26.99).
| RWMHX | ZDIIX | RWMHX / ZDIIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 1.06 | 39% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 1.16 | 35% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.555 | 9.640 | 16% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 5000 | 5% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 218B | 139M | 156,835% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.32 | 1.58 | 84% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.01 | 19.66 | 41% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.13 | 45.59 | 66% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.99 | 39.23 | 69% |
| Returns for 10 years | 81.70 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers