Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RWMHX vs ZDIIX
RWMHX vs ZDIIX Comparison
Open Charts RWMHX vs ZDIIX
RWMHX vs ZDIIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RWMHX vs. ZDIIX commentary
Jul 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RWMHX is a Hold and ZDIIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMHX has more cash in the bank: 219B vs. ZDIIX (143M). ZDIIX pays higher dividends than RWMHX: ZDIIX (1.55) vs RWMHX (1.35). RWMHX was incepted earlier than ZDIIX: RWMHX (11 years) vs ZDIIX (9 years). ZDIIX (1.16) is less costly to investors than RWMHX (0.41). RWMHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. ZDIIX (17.00). RWMHX has a lower initial minimum investment than ZDIIX: RWMHX (250) vs ZDIIX (5000). ZDIIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.83 vs. RWMHX (4.42). ZDIIX return over 5 years is better than : 42.60 vs. RWMHX (26.83).
| RWMHX | ZDIIX | RWMHX / ZDIIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 1.06 | 39% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 1.16 | 35% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.661 | 13.130 | 28% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 5000 | 5% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 219B | 143M | 153,147% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.35 | 1.55 | 87% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.42 | 17.83 | 25% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.44 | 42.39 | 62% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.83 | 42.60 | 63% |
| Returns for 10 years | 76.03 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers