Ad is loading...
RYARX vs RYCBX
RYARX vs RYCBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RYARX vs. RYCBX commentary
Apr 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RYARX is a Hold and RYCBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RYARX has more cash in the bank: 88.5M vs. RYCBX (12.7M). RYCBX pays higher dividends than RYARX: RYCBX (7.76) vs RYARX (7.12). RYARX was incepted earlier than RYCBX: RYARX (21 years) vs RYCBX (24 years). RYCBX (2.60) is less costly to investors than RYARX (1.80). RYARX (2500) and RYCBX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RYARX (1000) and RYCBX (1000) have similar IRA initial investment minimum. RYARX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -6.73 vs. RYCBX (-16.40). RYARX return over 5 years is better than : -51.32 vs. RYCBX (-81.12).
| RYARX | RYCBX | RYARX / RYCBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.70 | 2.52 | 67% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.80 | 2.60 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.836 | 18.330 | 59% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Net Assets | 88.5M | 12.7M | 697% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.12 | 7.76 | 92% |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.73 | -16.40 | 41% |
| Returns for 3 years | -16.91 | -42.05 | 40% |
| Returns for 5 years | -51.32 | -81.12 | 63% |
| Returns for 10 years | -71.74 | -94.84 | 76% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...