Ad is loading...
RYCFX vs SHSAX
RYCFX vs SHSAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RYCFX vs. SHSAX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RYCFX is a Hold and SHSAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SHSAX has more cash in the bank: 7.08B vs. RYCFX (85.8M). SHSAX pays higher dividends than RYCFX: SHSAX (0.21) vs RYCFX (0.00). RYCFX was incepted earlier than SHSAX: RYCFX (24 years) vs SHSAX (25 years). RYCFX (2.43) is less costly to investors than SHSAX (1.09). RYCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 51.00 vs. SHSAX (27.00). SHSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYCFX: SHSAX (1000) vs RYCFX (2500). SHSAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -7.49 vs. RYCFX (-19.97). SHSAX return over 5 years is better than : 16.14 vs. RYCFX (-27.70).
| RYCFX | SHSAX | RYCFX / SHSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.40 | 1.09 | 220% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.43 | 1.09 | 223% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.192 | 2.627 | -83% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 85.8M | 7.08B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.21 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -19.97 | -7.49 | 267% |
| Returns for 3 years | -24.86 | -9.44 | 263% |
| Returns for 5 years | -27.70 | 16.14 | -172% |
| Returns for 10 years | -50.29 | 21.61 | -233% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...