Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RYCFX vs SHSAX
RYCFX vs SHSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RYCFX vs. SHSAX commentary
Sep 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RYCFX is a Hold and SHSAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SHSAX has more cash in the bank: 6.07B vs. RYCFX (89.1M). SHSAX pays higher dividends than RYCFX: SHSAX (0.23) vs RYCFX (0.00). RYCFX was incepted earlier than SHSAX: RYCFX (25 years) vs SHSAX (26 years). RYCFX (2.43) is less costly to investors than SHSAX (1.09). RYCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 79.00 vs. SHSAX (43.00). SHSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYCFX: SHSAX (1000) vs RYCFX (2500). RYCFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -15.50 vs. SHSAX (-16.37). SHSAX return over 5 years is better than : -13.76 vs. RYCFX (-36.62).
| RYCFX | SHSAX | RYCFX / SHSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.38 | 1.09 | 218% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.43 | 1.09 | 223% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.589 | -4.596 | -230% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 89.1M | 6.07B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.23 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -15.50 | -16.37 | 95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.93 | 2.70 | 109% |
| Returns for 5 years | -36.62 | -13.76 | 266% |
| Returns for 10 years | -33.80 | 23.96 | -141% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement